Commentary: NRA locks in Mourdock for future votes
The first is that, if Mourdock gets elected, the NRA will own another member of the U.S. Senate.
During the Wednesday conference call announcing the endorsement, Mourdock – who is Indiana state treasurer – went to some lengths to explain how much he wanted the NRA endorsement. He said that he filled out a lot of forms for the NRA and answered a lot of questions from the NRA.
He interviewed for the endorsement and made commitments in order to get the nod.
Just how sweeping those commitments were became clear when Chris Cox – chairman of the NRA's Political Victory Fund – took over the conversation.
Cox said that Mourdock had agreed to vote the NRA position on all measures relating to guns and to vote the way the NRA wants him to on all U.S. Supreme Court nominations.
So much for a U.S. senator's deliberative function.
If Mourdock is elected to the U.S. Senate, both the NRA and Hoosier voters can count on him to roll over, fetch or beg whenever the gun lobby snaps its fingers. Richard Mourdock will be the NRA's poodle.
The second thing that's clear is that Mourdock and the NRA are more than willing not just to burn bridges, but to scorch the earth that surrounds the bridges.
Cox said that this was the only time he could recall that the NRA had endorsed a challenger to a Republican Senate incumbent. He said that Lugar had received an "F" grade from the gun group, while Mourdock had received an "A." Cox cited Lugar's refusal to sign a couple of legal briefs and his votes in support of President Barack Obama's Supreme Court nominees.
Cox implied that Lugar had lied to voters and said that the senator thought gun owners were "stupid." He said that Lugar was out of touch with "Indiana values" and "Indiana voters."
Those are words from which the gun lobby will have a hard time walking back.
If Lugar wins re-election, Cox and the NRA can count on having the same access to the senator's office that Osama Bin Laden does.
Cox and Mourdock seemed oblivious to the irony of a national lobbying group attacking someone for being out of touch with local values.
That's particularly true on the issue of whether Hoosier gun rights are imperiled.
Indiana's constitution doesn't have any of the qualifying language – the terms "militia" and "well-regulated" – that have prompted fierce debates through the years about what the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution really means. In Indiana, the constitution comes about as close to stating that Hoosiers have an absolute right to bear arms as any document can.
And, when it comes to a question of individual liberty, the more expansive protection prevails.
In the case of gun rights for Hoosiers, that means the Indiana Constitution trumps the U.S. Constitution. Gun ownership in the Hoosier state isn't likely to be under attack unless Indiana suddenly decides to draft a new constitution.
The chance of that happening is somewhere between nil and non-existent.
But the NRA really isn't worried about Hoosier gun owners – and Hoosier voters.
What the gun lobby wants – and, apparently, what the gun lobby will get with Mourdock – is an unquestioning voice in the U.S. Senate for all of its positions in both the national and international arenas.
To get that voice, Cox made it clear that the NRA would spend a lot of money on ads for Mourdock.
Mourdock said he negotiated hard for the NRA's endorsement.
We now know the terms of the deal.
Richard Mourdock's campaign gets a lot of advertising and organizational muscle from a well-funded and battle-tested national special interest group.
And what will the NRA get in return?
Well, if all goes as the gun lobby hopes, the NRA will be the proud owner of yet another U.S. senator.
John Krull is director of Franklin College's Pulliam School of Journalism, host of "No Limits," WFYI 90.1 FM Indianapolis and executive editor of TheStatehouseFile.com, a news website powered by Franklin College journalism students.